ACADEMIC IDENTITY OF A RESEARCHER IN THE CONTEXT OF OPEN SCIENCE: CONCEPTUAL GUIDELINES FOR CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH PRACTICES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62405/osiconf.2026.39Keywords:
academic identity; open science; research practices; academic career; research competencies; professional development.Abstract
Purpose. The present article endeavors to conceptualize researchers’ academic identity within the broader framework of the advancement of open science. Additionally, it aims to assess its heuristic value in interpreting contemporary research practices. Methods. The present study employs an analytical thematic review of the contemporary scholarly literature, utilizing thematic categorization, comparative analysis, and conceptual synthesis. Results. The findings demonstrate that the growing adoption of open science principles necessitates a reconceptualization of academic identity as a dynamic process of professional self-definition shaped through the interaction of institutional transformations, digital research practices, international academic collaboration, and emerging models of research assessment. The present study proposes a conceptual model of academic identity, integrating value-based, practice-oriented, communicative, and reflective dimensions. This model elucidates their interrelationships in the development of researchers' professional agency. Conclusions. This study makes a theoretical contribution to the understanding of academic identity by advancing an integrative conceptual framework that explains its transformation under the influence of open science. The proposed framework provides a foundation for the further operationalization of academic identity, the empirical investigation of its constituent dimensions, and the development of institutional strategies to support researchers’ professional development.
References
Barrow, M., Grant, B., & Xu, L. (2022). Academic identities research: Mapping the field's theoretical frameworks. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(2), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1849036
Borlaug, S. B., Tellmann, S. M., & Vabø, A. (2023). Nested identities and identification in higher education institutions: The role of organizational and academic identities. Higher Education, 85(2), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00837-5
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2015a). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 36–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000191
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2023b). Investment and motivation in language learning: What's the difference? Language Teaching, 56(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000057
Evans, M., & Fisher, L. (2022). The relevance of identity in languages education. The Language Learning Journal, 50(2), 218–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2022.2046693
Khraban, T. (2024). Rekomendatsii shchodo yakisnoho vysvitlennia problem neperervnoi osvity [Guidelines for quality coverage of continuing education issues]. Neperervna profesiina osvita: teoriia i praktyka, 3(80), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-0774.2024.3.5
Marques, R. M. G., Lopes, A., & Magalhães, A. M. (2024). Academic identities and higher education change: Reviewing the evidence. Educational Research, 66(2), 228–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2024.2334760
McCune, V. (2021). Academic identities in contemporary higher education: Sustaining identities that value teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1632826
McCune, V., Scoles, J., Boyd, S., Cross, A., Higgins, P., & Tauritz, R. (2024). Academic identities and teaching wicked problems: How to ‘shoot a fog’ in a complex landscape. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(1), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2215181
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
Xu, L., & Barrow, M. (2024). ‘Playing the same game differently’: Constituting academic identities in four disciplines. Higher Education, 88(4), 1645–1661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01187-0