MODERN APPROACHES AND EFFECTIVE TOOLS FOR POPULARIZATION OF EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17511006Keywords:
science popularization, science communication, digital tools, education, psychologyAbstract
The conducted analysis allowed for the identification and classification of the most effective tools for popularizing scientific knowledge in the fields of education and psychology. All tools were divided into two main categories. The first category comprises digital tools, which include popular science online platforms, social networks for the rapid dissemination of key findings, as well as podcasts and webinars that allow for a deeper exploration of research in an accessible format. The second category is represented by personal communication tools, such as public lectures, science cafés, and participation in science festivals, which ensure direct dialogue with the audience and create an emotional connection. Based on this classification, a comprehensive approach was proposed, which involves combining various information dissemination channels. Effective popularization is impossible using only one tool; the synergy between digital reach and personal contact significantly increases the impact of the research. However, the key success factor, regardless of the chosen channel, is recognized as the adaptation of content for specific target groups. For teachers, practicing psychologists, parents, or the general public, it is necessary to create materials free of complex scientific style. Popularization should be viewed not as an additional option, but as an integral part of scientific activity. It ensures the transfer of knowledge from the academic environment into societal practice, making science open and useful. The use of systematized tools helps to overcome the communication barrier between science and society. Consequently, this promotes the democratization of knowledge, where research results become accessible to every interested party, increases trust in science through transparency and accessibility of explanations, and enables the direct practical application of research results in real life, for example, in schools, counseling centers, or in the formation of public policy.
References
Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman L. (2013). Science communication to the general public: why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal scientific training. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ., 12(1), E6-E10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3852879/
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/23674
Baram-Tsabari, A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2017). Science communication training: what are we trying to teach? Int J Sci Educ, Part B,7(3), 285-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2017.1303756
Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Kuchel L. (2017). Core Skills for Effective Science Communication: ATeaching Resource for Undergraduate Science Education. Int J Sci Educ, Part B,7(2), 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.1113573