REGISTERING SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS IN UKRAINE: PROBLEMS, DEVELOPMENT OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS ABOUT JOURNALS AND ONTOLOGICAL APPROACH

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62405/osi.2025.01.02

Keywords:

scientific journal classification, research database, NAUKA system, metadata standardization, journal registry automation, ministerial oversight

Abstract

The classification and management of scientific journals in Ukraine remain fragmented, with multiple registries operating independently and lacking interoperability. This study examines the structural deficiencies of existing journal databases and proposes a centralized, governmentbacked registry within the National Electronic Scientific Information System (NAUKA)
to serve as the primary authoritative source for journal classification. The research identifies key shortcomings in current repositories, including the absence of unique identifiers, non-standardized data formats, lack of historical tracking, and reliance on manual updates. Through an analysis of existing classification mechanisms, this paper underscores the need for a unified system with automated validation, version control, and ministerial oversight through electronic signature authentication. The proposed system aims to enhance transparency and accessibility by integrating advanced search functionalities, automated categorization updates, and structured metadata fields such as ISSN, publisher details, indexing status, and classification history. A critical component of this framework is the introduction of a mechanism ensuring Mistry representatives data inputting or approval, ensuring that modifications to the registry are securely verified and legally sanctioned. The implementation of this system would eliminate redundant manual processes, prevent discrepancies in classification, and facilitate seamless integration with national and international scientometric databases. This paper concludes by outlining a structured development roadmap for integrating the proposed module into NAUKA, emphasizing its role in fostering a transparent and standardized academic publishing environment in Ukraine.

References

Arı, A. (2024). The World’s Scholarly Publications at Your Fingertips with Scilit from Basel, Switzerland. International Journal of instruction, 17(1), i–iv. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.1710a

Franchuk, N. P. (2023). Advantages of using the open Ukrainian citation index OUCI. Modern Digital Technologies and Innovative Teaching Methods: Experience, Trends, Prospects, 12. (in Ukrainian)

Ivanov, S., Ivohin, E., & Makhno, M. (2024). Automation of accounting of publications using the ORCID application programming interface. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Series: Physics and Mathematics, 1, 141–146. https://doi.org/10.17721/1812-5409.2024/1.26

Jalal, S. K. (2019). Co-authorship and co-occurrences analysis using bibliometrix r-package: A case study of india and bangladesh. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 66(2), 57–64.

Kocira, S., Kuboń, M., Malaga-Toboła, U., & Kwaśniewski, D. (2019). ACADEMIC TEACHERS’PREFERENCES IN SELECTING SCIENTIFIC DATABASES. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 5, 355. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol5.3950

Koval, Y. (2022). Application of modern information systems and technologies in scientific activity. PEDAGOGY AND EDUCATION MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.36690/2733-2039-2022-5-11

Lavik, G. A. V., & Sivertsen, G. (2017). Erih Plus - Making the Ssh Visible, Searchable and Available. Procedia Computer Science, 106(1877), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.03.035

Prykhodnyuk, V. V., Gorborukov, V. V., Shapovalov, E. B., & Savchenko, Ya. V. (2023). The use of information and analytical platforms in the organization of scientific and research activities on adaptive principles. 2nd International Scientific Forum «Adaptive Processes in Education», 259–261.

Shapovalov, V. B., & Shapovalova, M. V. (2023). THE IMPORTANCE OF THE SCIENTIFICMETRIC SYSTEM «OPEN UKRAINIAN CITATION INDEX» (OUCI) AND THE POTENTIAL OF ESTABLISHING ONTOLOGIES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF UKRAINIAN SCIENCE. Scientific

Notes of Junior Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 3(3(28)), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.51707/2618-0529-2023-28-11 (in Ukrainian)

Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5113–5142.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5

Spinellis, D. D. (2023). Open Reproducible Systematic Publication Research. ArXiv, abs/2301.13312.

Strungar, A., & Plysenko, G. (2023). REVIEW OF THE NATIONAL SYSTEM OPEN UKRAINIAN CITATION INDEX (OUCI). Science and Technology Today, 5(5(19)), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6025-2023-5(19)-50-57 (in Ukrainian)

Suárez, D., Peralta, M. J., Piedra, Y., & Navarro, M. A. (2022). Thematic coverage of CRIS in WoS, Scopus and Dimensions (2000-2020). Procedia Computer Science, 211(C), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.10.189

Thippanna, G. (2024). Publication of Different Journals and their Significance in Categorical Indices. September. https://doi.org/10.48001/jodsc.2024.1212-18

Yaroshenko, T., & Yaroshenko, O. (2024). MEASURING THE IMPACT OF SCIENCE: BEYOND TRADITION. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MODERN SCIENTIFIC TOOLS AND THEIR ROLE IN DETERMINING SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTION. Open Science and Innovation, 1(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.62405/osi.2024.01.02

Downloads

Published

2025-04-17 — Updated on 2025-04-21

Versions